Google ai recognizes cats, oh really?

So people at google are smart, and I mean really smart. Their goals are high, and I mean really high, moonshot high.

They've made|bought|tricked software able to actually come up with a cat, based on watching a million or 2, youtube movies. I dread to think what it could have come up with if it would have followed -my- youtube clicks...

Google invented and made and sells google glasses, currently a feat not just impressive but basically radically impressive.

Bought a thermostat company for 3 billion.

Bought a robot and a drone and a balloon company and is trying to reach new highs. I applaud that, [I applaud them mainly for google search and for gmail not for that monster google+ and not for killing google reader and google picasa!] but for having these wild dreams and actually putting there incredible resources into finding solutions for billions of people.

Thank you google. Thank you Larry, thank you engineers and early financial backers.

But why on earth would one spend a quatrillion dollars on the problems of tomorrow, where we, the billions of people that are customers of google and every single device they use, ARE SUFFERING FROM RIDICULES PROBLEMS LIKE SSLHEARTBLEED?

How on earth is it possible that there is no AI|engineer|smartass that actually comes up with a something that can prevent|warn|find stupid little problems as 'a typo' or an illogic piece of computer code?

Apple's CVE-2014-1266 would have been identified if only the right parameters would have been giving to the compiler.

Try that again: the whole problem of apple's double goto would have been AUTOMATICALLY DETECTED if the code was compile ONLY ONCE, with the proper compiler argument.

We're under constant attack by governments and maffia a like and the smartest company on earth is teaching cars to drive autonomous and simply ignores the most fundamental problem:

computercode that does what it is supposed to do.

WHY?

DNS and what have you

DNS, the beast. 

There is a lot to know about DNS and it keeps evolving in a steady pace.

A blog I like that focusses on the abuse part of DDoS DNS is dnsamplificationattacks. I even tried to setup a sort of the same infrastructure to see how long it would take for a resolver to be descovered and abused. The result? It takes mere minutes to be discovered [scanned by 122.136.196.116] and rather hour then days before your open resolver is used.

/var/log/syslog.1:Oct 15 13:25:25 vps1463 named[1376]: client 122.136.196.116#835: query: aa.10781.info IN ANY +E (91.213.195.47)
/var/log/syslog.1:Oct 15 13:25:25 vps1463 named[1376]: client 122.136.196.116#835: query (cache) 'aa.10781.info/A/IN' denied
/var/log/syslog.1:Oct 15 13:25:53 doknowevil named[18459]: client 198.206.14.130#33765: query: aa.10781.info IN ANY +E (91.213.195.47)
/var/log/syslog.1:Oct 15 13:25:53 doknowevil named[18459]: client 198.206.14.130#33765: query (cache) 'aa.10781.info/ANY/IN' denied
/var/log/syslog.1:Oct 15 13:25:53 manandmice named[11516]: client 198.206.14.130#33765: query: aa.10781.info IN ANY +E (91.213.195.198)
/var/log/syslog.1:Oct 15 13:25:53 manandmice named[11516]: client 198.206.14.130#33765: query (cache) 'aa.10781.info/ANY/IN' denied
/var/log/syslog.1:Oct 15 14:09:39 xxx.static.dimenoc.com named[429]: client 122.136.196.116#64794: query: aa.10781.info IN A +E (198.49.72.223)
/var/log/syslog.1:Oct 15 14:09:39 xxx.static.dimenoc.com named[429]: client 122.136.196.116#64794: query (cache) 'aa.10781.info/A/IN' denied

These 4 hosts are AS miles apart from one and other. None has ever functioned as a open resolver.

Then I wanted to find out a little more about the current state of the DNS protocol. When I started using DNS, it would use UDP for about everything but a zone transfer. That has changed with the Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0). Initially the larger requests originated from [poorly] implemented DNSSEC zones caused pain. Loads of TCP queries all of a sudden and the surprise results that came with it in different networks.

 RFC 4035 has something to say about DNSSEC and message sizes:

A security-aware name server MUST support the EDNS0 ([RFC2671]) message size extension, MUST support a message size of at least 1220 octets, and SHOULD support a message size of 4000 octets.

Come in:

OARC's DNS Reply Size Test Server

The maximim reply size between a DNS server and resolver may be limited by a number of factors:

• If a resolver does not support the Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS), replies are limited to 512 bytes.
• The resolver may be behind a firewall that blocks IP fragments.
• Some DNS-aware firewalls block responses larger than 512 bytes.

The BIND resolver, since version 9.5.0, includes a feature to decrease its advertised EDNS receive buffer size (down to 512) when its queries time out. We've seen this lead to significant increases in TCP for DNSSEC-signed zones.

DNS-OARC built the DNS Reply Size Test Server to help users identify resolvers that cannot receive large DNS replies.

How To Use

To use the DNS Reply Size Test Server, simply use dig command line tool to issue a TXT query for the name rs.dns-oarc.net:

$ dig +short rs.dns-oarc.net txt

You can test a specific DNS resolver by using the @server feature of dig.

The output should look something like this:

rst.x4001.rs.dns-oarc.net.
rst.x3985.x4001.rs.dns-oarc.net.
rst.x4023.x3985.x4001.rs.dns-oarc.net.
"192.168.1.1 sent EDNS buffer size 4096"
"192.168.1.1 DNS reply size limit is at least 4023 bytes"

The first three lines of the output are CNAME records in the response. The "x" numbers represent the sizes of successfully received responses at each step in the test. The final two lines are TXT records that provide information on the test results. Here we can see that the resolver advertised a receive buffer size of 4096 and the server was able to send a response of 4023 bytes.

If your test results in a reply size limit of less than about 4,000 you may want to investigate further. See the excellent write up here.

With all the dig'ing like

dig google.com ANY @myveryownresolver

came the desire for more useable statistics on what was going on in named land. Over at merit the there is a nice little tool that does exactly that. statDNS. The tool is called for what it does. The output is limited and that is what I was looking for to get an impression of what as happening.

For a little more info on the resolving ability side of things, I actually liked the CLI version of netalyzer. Ok it requiers java but on a trashable VPS that is not a real issue. Check here for sample output of one of the hosts I tried it on. It shows a lot more then only DNS resolving issues, and I was surprised to see the IPv6 tests it did. Guess there is still hope for v6 ;)

You made it to here, well done! Here´s a present.

204004DYNMVFNLACR

204004DYNMVFNLACR
Vodafone Anonymous Customer Recognition

http://referaat.cs.utwente.nl/TSConIT/download.php?id=1069
http://www.mulliner.org/collin/academic/publications/mobile_web_privacy_icin10_mulliner.pdf

Gotta love 'm for it.

IPv6 + google = captcha

Dear google, 

I applaude you for being one of the biggest and one of the first to permanetly publish quad A's. Really. Very gutsy. 

But since I setup my proxy [squid3] on my server [Tilaa VPS 3.2.0-30-virtual #48-Ubuntu SMP] with the latest and greatest Ubuntu 12.04, all my drones are being forced to out themselfs as human by your [admitedly, friendly and well readable!] captcha. 

Multiple times a day. 

Ubuntu has by default enabled the IPv6 Privacy Extensions [RFC 4941]. This is nice, and in my book something that is desireable, but with the captcha's poping up all day long it gets old very fast. 

 Google, would it be feasable for your guys to tweak the 'monitoring for robot access' script a little and check for robot access not on a per IP[v6] address but on IPv6/64's? 

 128 bits of thanks!

Me like

A couple of tools I'd like to test drive: http://www.southord.com/Lock-Picking-Tools/Electric-Lock-Pick-Set-E500XT.html http://www.tweedehands.nl/hobby-vrije-tijd/handvaardigheid/gereedschap/klopsleutels-klopsleutel-slagsleutel-bumpkey-lockpick-110728211.html http://www.southord.com/Lock-Picking-Tools/Tubular-Lock-Picks.html While enjoying some simple music: http://soundcloud.com/eerdhuizen/recorded-live-woodstock-69-06 And I need a blokeersleutel: http://www.euroscooters.nl/advanced_search_result.php?keywords=Blokkeersleutel+&search_in_description=1&x=0&y=0 And then some...

528140000468795 Thank you!

528140000468795 is my dog's chip number. It's a Staffordshire Bull Terrier.
He's registered in the database of NDG, and being registered in different other registars as Stichting Chip,




Currently the number 528140000468795 does not yield any results in Google. This post will change that.

WiFi roaming on Android [Declined!]

It's an absolute disgrace that Google/Droid/Samsung/HTC can't solve problems like WiFi roaming in 2012.
I know Android is the poorman's iPhone but still, the pointing to the hardware by the software guys and visa versa is a major blast from the past. ICS shows little to no improvement for the hand full of devices it is available for [do _not_ get me started on the pathetic availability of ICS for droid devices!].


I will not even mention the 'support' for VPN.
Nor the malware-ized software.
Nor the pathetic 'choice' END USERS are required to judge and agree to about access to resources when installing software.
I have emerged myself in the Android world, putting all my iDevices in a locked box since 3 months and replace them with Samsung [tablets] and HTC [phones], and as much as I like the larger displays, the freedom to tinker, the whole experience has shown me one thing: Android with it's fragmented [per hardware manufacturer, per device] support and the silly fail to solve rudimentary issues like WiFi roaming [do not get me started on application availability across devices!], is just too olt skool to expose but the choice-less consumers to.
Within a couple of weeks I have hold up to my promise to my employer [a rather large telecom company] to at least give Android a shot, but I will celebrate the day my devices will 'just work' and I can focus on work rather then geting the infrastructure to cater for broken consumer devices. It has been a good experience, but only to fortify my expectations that Android with it's manufacturer driven 'support' and 'upgrades' is just not ready for business.

I've tried the Best Wifi app, with varying results.
Multi BSSID single ssid android
Picture from multiple sources [see here]

"niets is maar ik ben"

"Niets is, maar ik ben", ik weet 't.

Niets is, maar ik ben.

UPC Thomson TWG870 modem :(

With the upgrade to 120Mbit I also received a new modem, the Thomson TWG870. It's DOCSIS 3.0, with very decent WiFi, and a couple of issues.

It's an 'end user' device, where end user should be read as dumb-ass-I-need-not-one-change-nor-control-over-my-own-network kinda user. Ok, one can set the SSID, and password and even the WiFi compatibility, but that is about it. Want the device in bridge mode? Forget it, disabled by your friendly provider! You would like to assign fixed leases for particular device in your wired/wifi network? Forget it, just not possible.

"IP Flood Detection" slows the box down to a crawl, just turn it off. FTP can cause issues, but then again, this is a protocol that is about as clean as SMNP is secure. And while at it, the updating of the firmware has been disabled, so all UPC customers will proberbly never update, till they order a new modem.

And the whole interface is just... so incredible 1.0 it should really be used in the-greatest-design-fuckups-ever contest.

So now I'd need to switch back to the reliable Cisco EPC3000. There is absolutely nothing fancy about this modem, except maybe the USB port. For the rest it is simply a useable bridge. I'll do my nat'ing and what have you not myself, thanks UPC!

He does not age, he levels...

Some expressions are so good, they deserve a hit on google.

He does not age, he levels, is one of those.

Pintupi Planner

Want to get rich? Here's the ticket.

We all stumble upon super stories, excellent excibitions and great geographical descriptions but most of the time at the wrong time and the wrong place.

So here is the idea: make a location aware reminder service.

You RSS some cool information about a place, link it to a location with, depending on interest a larger or smaller range, and get notified of that information if you ever in your live get within that range. On sites with information that is linkable to a location, the content owner will place a purple button ' P' which will insert the reminder with location.

Seems I am not alone with a gripe against S O N Y. From the Anon site:













Dear Greedy Motherfuckers^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H SONY,

Congratulations! You are now receiving the attention of Anonymous. Your recent legal actions against fellow internet citizens, GeoHot and Graf_Chokolo have been deemed an unforgivable offense against free speech and internet freedom, primary sources of free lulz (and you know how we feel about lulz.)

You have abused the judicial system in an attempt to censor information about how your products work. You have victimized your own customers merely for possessing and sharing information, and continue to target those who seek this information. In doing so you have violated the privacy of thousands of innocent people who only sought the free distribution of information. Your suppression of this information is motivated by corporate greed and the desire for complete control over the actions of individuals who purchase and use your products, at least when those actions threaten to undermine the corrupt stranglehold you seek to maintain over copywrong, oops, "copyright".

Your corrupt business practices are indicative of a corporate philosophy that would deny consumers the right to use products they have paid for, and rightfully own, in the manner of their choosing. Perhaps you should alert your customers to the fact that they are apparently only renting your products? In light of this assault on both rights and free expression, Anonymous, the notoriously handsome rulers of the internet, would like to inform you that you have only been "renting" your web domains. Having trodden upon Anonymous' rights, you must now be trodden on.

If you disagree with the disciplinary actions against your private parts^H^H^H^H domains, then we trust you can also understand our motivations for these actions. You own your domains. You paid for them with your own money. Now Anonymous is attacking your private property because we disagree with your actions. And that seems, dare we say it, "wrong." Sound familiar?

Let Anonymous teach you a few important lessons that your mother forgot:
1. Don't do it to someone else if you don't want it to be done to you.
2. Information is free.
3. We own this. Forever.

As for the "judges" and complicit legal entities who have enabled these cowards: You are no better than SONY itself in our eyes and remain guilty of undermining the well-being of the populace and subverting your judicial mandate.


We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not Forgive.
We do not Forget.
Expect us.

Webresentation

Webresentation is becoming more important then any other old form of being.
"I 200, thus I am"

GeoHot sued by Sony. NEVER buy their gear no more!

So, hot on the heels of the no lube ass pounding of HBGary & affiliates, here is another company that might take on a party they should not mess with. As he puts it "You're fucking with the dude who got the keys to your safe"

How wize that is, I leave to you...



Yo it's geohot
And for those that don't know
I'm getting sued by Sony
Let's take this out of the courtroom and into the streets
I'm a beast, at the least, you'll face me in the northeast
Get my ire up, light my fire
I'll go harder than Eminem went at Mariah
Call me a liar
Pound me in the ass with no lube, chafing
You're fucking with the dude who got the keys to your safe and
Those that can't do bring suits
Cry to your Uncle Sam to settle disputes
Thought you'd tackle this with a little more tact
But then again fudgepackers, I don't know Jack
I shed a tear everytime I think of Lik Sang
But shit man, they're a corporation
And I'm a personification of freedom for all
You fill dockets, like thats a concept foreign to y'all
While lawyers muddy water and TRO's stall
Out of business is jail for me
And you're sueing me civilly
Exhibit this in the courtroom
Go on, do it, I dare you

Why not

Esse parece algum servidor de imagens do Picasa. This seems some server images from Picasa.

Today Craig showed up at the airport. We discussed not solutions but issues. And dox'ing.

And concluded that analog interference sounds better then binary so please take the binary out of the digital music.

PreyProject

While looking into certain particular aspects of 'tracking software' I stumbled upon the PreyProject. So I added a couple of my own devices and marked some as missing to see what information it would actually be able to give me.

Unknowningly to my son, he was participating in this trail. So here he is using his machine in a for him normal way. That means among others that he will have turned off as many as possible services and tray icons and other bloatware to get the best possible FPS. PreyProject was still running however and producing results:



I had to laugh when I saw the screenshot...

bullet proof TLD - part deux

And I am not alone on this. Seems the guys and gals from the Pirate Bay thought the same and moved their arses.

Enter P2P DNS

Some observations here

bullet proof TLD

We need a "bullet proof tld". Seeing what happens with wikileaks ATM makes me worry.

I do not like what wikileaks does, but they are merely the publishers, not the creators, nor the leakers...

HUAWEI Mobile == horror

This happens once a day, simply open up gmail with gtalk enabled will whack my machine. HUAWEI makes it possible.

Interval Since Last Panic Report: 67994 sec
Panics Since Last Report: 1
Anonymous UUID: 3879FB28-9833-4155-99DD-722A33411EAB

Wed Nov 3 07:57:30 2010
panic(cpu 0 caller 0x2a8ab2): Kernel trap at 0x227d78a3, type 14=page fault, registers:
CR0: 0x8001003b, CR2: 0x000004a8, CR3: 0x00100000, CR4: 0x000006e0
EAX: 0x00000000, EBX: 0x04e4f000, ECX: 0x09000000, EDX: 0x0426e800
CR2: 0x000004a8, EBP: 0x22433b08, ESI: 0x04e4f000, EDI: 0x03fc2b00
EFL: 0x00010206, EIP: 0x227d78a3, CS: 0x00000008, DS: 0x00000010
Error code: 0x00000000

Backtrace (CPU 0), Frame : Return Address (4 potential args on stack)
0x22433918 : 0x21b455 (0x5cf328 0x2243394c 0x2238b1 0x0)
0x22433968 : 0x2a8ab2 (0x591664 0x227d78a3 0xe 0x59182e)
0x22433a48 : 0x29e9a8 (0x22433a60 0x4e4f000 0x22433b08 0x227d78a3)
0x22433a58 : 0x227d78a3 (0xe 0x48 0x10 0x4e40010)
0x22433b08 : 0x9590cb (0x4e4f000 0x3fc2b00 0x0 0x8)
0x22433b48 : 0x958e0a (0x4e4f000 0x2 0x3fc2b00 0x0)
0x22433b88 : 0x548cf9 (0x4e4f000 0x22433c00 0x0 0x0)
0x22433bd8 : 0x958e86 (0x488d600 0x958dc8 0x22433c00 0x0)
0x22433c28 : 0x958f17 (0x4e4f000 0x3fc2b00 0x958fc6 0x4e4f000)
0x22433c58 : 0x953d68 (0x4e4f000 0x3fc2b00 0x7 0x3fc2b00)
0x22433c78 : 0x5356be (0x3fc2b00 0x4e4f000 0x7 0x4fe006)
0x22433ce8 : 0x547337 (0x4e4f000 0x7 0x4809f40 0x0)
0x22433d18 : 0x531ee8 (0x395df80 0x5355b0 0x4e4f000 0x7)
0x22433d68 : 0x536251 (0x4809f40 0x0 0x0 0x449bf40)
0x22433de8 : 0x537363 (0x7 0x3e98500 0x1 0x0)
0x22433e48 : 0x537a9b (0x3e98500 0x6 0x0 0xffffffff)
0x22433ec8 : 0x537ac3 (0x3e98500 0x6 0x22433f08 0x542f000)
0x22433ee8 : 0xe64e9c (0x3e98500 0x2 0x1 0x456ab80)
0x22433f08 : 0xe6c329 (0x3e98500 0x2 0x456ab8c 0x293b71)
0x22433f28 : 0xe6c419 (0x542f000 0x7 0x22433f58 0x4fb982)
0x22433f58 : 0xe6c4d4 (0x542f000 0x0 0x22433f78 0x2a1591)
0x22433f78 : 0x22fb84 (0x542f000 0x0 0x0 0xbfffdcfc)
0x22433fc8 : 0x29e6cc (0x863ea0 0x0 0x10 0x43c8de4)
Kernel Extensions in backtrace (with dependencies):
com.huawei.driver.HuaweiDataCardECMData(1.19.00)@0x227d3000->0x227dafff
dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOUSBFamily(4.0.2)@0xe5c000
dependency: com.apple.iokit.IONetworkingFamily(1.9)@0x952000
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBFamily(4.0.2)@0xe5c000->0xe8cfff
dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily(2.6)@0x926000
com.apple.iokit.IONetworkingFamily(1.9)@0x952000->0x967fff

BSD process name corresponding to current thread: kernel_task

Mac OS version:
10F569

Kernel version:
Darwin Kernel Version 10.4.0: Fri Apr 23 18:28:53 PDT 2010; root:xnu-1504.7.4~1/RELEASE_I386
System model name: MacBook3,1 (Mac-F22788C8)

System uptime in nanoseconds: 68307501559045
unloaded kexts:
com.apple.driver.AppleWWANSupport 2.0.3b0 (addr 0xcc8000, size 0x12288) - last unloaded 68242737696090
loaded kexts:
de.novamedia.driver.NMSmartplugSCSIDevice 1.0.1 - last loaded 68167435223328
com.huawei.driver.HuaweiDataCardECMData 1.19.00
com.huawei.driver.HuaweiDataCardECMControl 1.19.00
com.huawei.driver.HuaweiDataCardACMData 4.05.00
foo.tun 1.0
foo.tap 1.0
com.apple.filesystems.smbfs 1.6.2
com.apple.driver.AppleHWSensor 1.9.3d0
com.apple.driver.SMCMotionSensor 3.0.0d4
com.apple.filesystems.autofs 2.1.0
com.apple.driver.AudioAUUC 1.4
com.apple.driver.AppleHDA 1.8.7f1
com.apple.driver.AppleUpstreamUserClient 3.3.2
com.apple.Dont_Steal_Mac_OS_X 7.0.0
com.apple.iokit.CHUDUtils 364
com.apple.iokit.CHUDProf 364
com.apple.driver.AudioIPCDriver 1.1.2
com.apple.driver.AppleIntelMeromProfile 19.1
com.apple.driver.AppleBacklight 170.0.24
com.apple.driver.ACPI_SMC_PlatformPlugin 4.1.2b1
com.apple.driver.AppleLPC 1.4.12
com.apple.driver.AppleIntelGMAX3100 6.1.8
com.apple.driver.AppleIntelGMAX3100FB 6.1.8
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBTrackpad 1.8.1b1
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBTCKeyEventDriver 1.8.1b1
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBTCKeyboard 1.8.1b1
com.apple.driver.AppleIRController 303.8
com.apple.iokit.SCSITaskUserClient 2.6.5
com.apple.iokit.AppleYukon2 3.1.14b1
com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIBlockStorage 1.6.2
com.apple.driver.AppleAHCIPort 2.1.2
com.apple.driver.AppleIntelPIIXATA 2.5.1
com.apple.BootCache 31
com.apple.AppleFSCompression.AppleFSCompressionTypeZlib 1.0.0d1
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBHub 4.0.0
com.apple.driver.AppleSmartBatteryManager 160.0.0
com.apple.driver.AppleFWOHCI 4.7.1
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBEHCI 4.0.2
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBUHCI 4.0.2
com.apple.driver.AirPortBrcm43xx 423.91.27
com.apple.driver.AppleEFINVRAM 1.3.0
com.apple.driver.AppleRTC 1.3.1
com.apple.driver.AppleHPET 1.5
com.apple.driver.AppleACPIButtons 1.3.2
com.apple.driver.AppleSMBIOS 1.6
com.apple.driver.AppleACPIEC 1.3.2
com.apple.driver.AppleAPIC 1.4
com.apple.driver.AppleIntelCPUPowerManagementClient 105.10.0
com.apple.security.sandbox 0
com.apple.security.quarantine 0
com.apple.nke.applicationfirewall 2.1.11
com.apple.driver.AppleIntelCPUPowerManagement 105.10.0
com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIBlockCommandsDevice 2.6.5
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBMassStorageClass 2.6.1
com.apple.driver.AppleProfileReadCounterAction 17
com.apple.iokit.IOFireWireIP 2.0.3
com.apple.driver.DspFuncLib 1.8.7f1
com.apple.driver.AppleProfileTimestampAction 10
com.apple.driver.AppleProfileThreadInfoAction 14
com.apple.driver.AppleProfileRegisterStateAction 10
com.apple.driver.AppleProfileKEventAction 10
com.apple.driver.AppleProfileCallstackAction 20
com.apple.iokit.IOSurface 74.0
com.apple.iokit.IOBluetoothSerialManager 2.3.3f8
com.apple.iokit.IOSerialFamily 10.0.3
com.apple.iokit.CHUDKernLib 365
com.apple.iokit.IOAudioFamily 1.7.6fc2
com.apple.kext.OSvKernDSPLib 1.3
com.apple.driver.AppleHDAController 1.8.7f1
com.apple.iokit.IOHDAFamily 1.8.7f1
com.apple.iokit.AppleProfileFamily 41.4
com.apple.driver.IOPlatformPluginFamily 4.1.2b1
com.apple.driver.AppleSMC 3.0.1d2
com.apple.iokit.IONDRVSupport 2.1
com.apple.iokit.IOGraphicsFamily 2.1
com.apple.driver.CSRUSBBluetoothHCIController 2.3.3f8
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBBluetoothHCIController 2.3.3f8
com.apple.iokit.IOBluetoothFamily 2.3.3f8
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBMergeNub 4.0.0
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBHIDDriver 4.0.2
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBComposite 3.9.0
com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIMultimediaCommandsDevice 2.6.5
com.apple.iokit.IOBDStorageFamily 1.6
com.apple.iokit.IODVDStorageFamily 1.6
com.apple.iokit.IOCDStorageFamily 1.6
com.apple.driver.XsanFilter 402.1
com.apple.iokit.IOATAPIProtocolTransport 2.5.1
com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIArchitectureModelFamily 2.6.5
com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIFamily 2.0.4
com.apple.iokit.IOATAFamily 2.5.1
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBUserClient 4.0.0
com.apple.iokit.IOFireWireFamily 4.2.6
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBFamily 4.0.2
com.apple.iokit.IO80211Family 311.1
com.apple.iokit.IONetworkingFamily 1.9
com.apple.driver.AppleEFIRuntime 1.3.0
com.apple.iokit.IOHIDFamily 1.6.4
com.apple.iokit.IOSMBusFamily 1.1
com.apple.kext.AppleMatch 1.0.0d1
com.apple.security.TMSafetyNet 6
com.apple.driver.DiskImages 283
com.apple.iokit.IOStorageFamily 1.6.1
com.apple.driver.AppleACPIPlatform 1.3.2
com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily 2.6
com.apple.iokit.IOACPIFamily 1.3.0
Model: MacBook3,1, BootROM MB31.008E.B02, 2 processors, Intel Core 2 Duo, 2.2 GHz, 1 GB, SMC 1.24f3
Graphics: Intel GMA X3100, GMA X3100, Built-In, 144 MB
Memory Module: global_name
AirPort: spairport_wireless_card_type_airport_extreme (0x14E4, 0x88), Broadcom BCM43xx 1.0 (5.10.91.27)
Bluetooth: Version 2.3.3f8, 2 service, 19 devices, 1 incoming serial ports
Serial ATA Device: Hitachi HTS542512K9SA00, 111,79 GB
Parallel ATA Device: HL-DT-ST DVDRW GSA-S10N
USB Device: Built-in iSight, 0x05ac (Apple Inc.), 0x8501, 0xfd400000
USB Device: HUAWEI Mobile, 0x12d1, 0x1465, 0xfa200000
USB Device: Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad, 0x05ac (Apple Inc.), 0x022a, 0x5d200000
USB Device: IR Receiver, 0x05ac (Apple Inc.), 0x8242, 0x5d100000
USB Device: Bluetooth USB Host Controller, 0x05ac (Apple Inc.), 0x8205, 0x1a100000

Buy apple, forget orange

As all sane people should, I like to buy shares of a company that sells products that I believe in and as soon as the shares have rissen enough to pay for the product I buy it.

This is the moment [again] to get yourself some Apple shares. Why? Because they so get what we want.

The next super step will be the iPhone5. It will change your live or at least [if you do not owe a mac by then], the way you will expect your computer live to be. How? This is how:

If users wave an NFC-equipped iPhone and an NFC-equipped Mac, the Mac will load all their applications, settings and data. It will be as though they are sitting at their own machine at home or work. When the user leaves, and the NFC-equipped iPhone is out of range, the host machine returns to its previous state.”
The source told Cult of Mac: “The system would essentially turn any Apple computer in to your own, like you’re actually working on your own computer; same settings, look, bookmarks, preferences. It would all be invisible. Your iPhone would be all you needed to unlock your Mac.”

See, that is what you never knew you wanted but actually is. Just like the interface of the iPhone, it's something you never knew you missed but once you touched it, you can not let go. This will rock your world.

The smart money is there already ofc. 52 week high and low 185.57 - 319.00. But still, still I bet you that buying a couple of stocks now, will give you a premium when you will buy your iPhone5 and NFC-equipped Mac. Check for current stock prices here.

Edit: 9/11 2012. One day before the [roumored] launch of the iPhone5.
665.82  3.08(0.46%) 11:59AM EDT - Nasdaq Real Time Price